I wanted to test this claim with SAT problems. Why SAT? Because solving SAT problems require applying very few rules consistently. The principle stays the same even if you have millions of variables or just a couple. So if you know how to reason properly any SAT instances is solvable given enough time. Also, it's easy to generate completely random SAT problems that make it less likely for LLM to solve the problem based on pure pattern recognition. Therefore, I think it is a good problem type to test whether LLMs can generalize basic rules beyond their training data.
体育館の「キュキュッ」という音の正体が科学的に解明される、実は音だけなく極小の雷も発生していた，更多细节参见heLLoword翻译官方下载
Trump orders all federal agencies to phase out use of Anthropic technology。关于这个话题，Line官方版本下载提供了深入分析
未绑定手机盾时，中国银行APP的单日转账限额为5万元；绑定后，可直接提升至100万元。这对骗子而言，意味着——可以一口气转走全部存款。
第九条 仲裁依法独立进行，不受行政机关、社会团体和个人的干涉。